Rules. o Pl - Del E. Webb. Facts. CASE BRIEF 10.1 Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Dev. From a judgment permanently enjoining the defendant, Spur Industries, Inc., from operating a cattle feedlot near the plaintiff Del E. Webb Development Company's Sun City, Spur appeals. Inc., from operating a cattle feedlot near the plaintiff Del E. Webb Development Company’s Sun City, Spur appeals. Property • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 ... Have you written case briefs that you want to share with our community? Erika Holbert 1 CASE BRIEF 10.1 Spur Industries Inc. v. Del E. Webb Dev. Plantiffs sued to declare the feedlot a public nuisance. Get compensated for submitting them here Adult Search. o 14 to 15 miles west of Phoenix, Az.. What happened? As the new community grew in size, it approach defendant's feedlot. Dell Webb “wins” but they have to pay. SPUR INDUSTRIES, INC., an Arizona corporation formerly Spur Feeding Co., an Arizona corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. DEL E. WEBB DEVELOPMENT CO., an Arizona corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Webb cross-appeals. According to our text, a nuisance consists of odors, ongoing damage, excessive noise, polluted air, and dangerous facilities that may cause health concerns (Jennings, 2018). What were the factors that made the Spur’s activities a nuisance? Navigation. 25 [108 Ariz. 179] 27 o Df - Spur Industries. o Defendant owned cattle feedlots prior to the construction of plaintiff's nearby residential development.. o Plaintiff sued defendant, claiming that the feedlots were a public nuisance because of the flies and odor that drifted toward the development. 17 No. 10410. . What are the facts, rule, and conclusion in Spur Industries Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.? Spur Industries v. Del Webb Development Case Brief. The feedlot produced unpleasant scents and flies which were blown in the direction of the new community. "The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. Home » Case Briefs Bank » Property » Spur Industries v. Del Webb Development Case Brief. 23 March 17, 1972. The cattle feeding pens and dairy operations grew rapidly over the years. These lots were located about ½ mile South of Olive Avenue. Area in Question. . "From a judgment permanently enjoining the defendant, Spur Industries, Inc., from operating a cattle feedlot near the plaintiff Del E. Webb Development Company's Sun City, Spur appeals. " View Spur_case_brief from REAL ESTAT 33:851:350 at Rutgers University. These damages are probably awarded because it was foreseeable when they expanded toward the feedlot that this problem would occur. - facts= developer sued to permanently enjoin a cattle feedlot operation that was in close proximity to a residential development it was creating, the feedlot owner counterclaimed for indemnification from the developer if it was enjoined from operation The remedy is an injunction on condition that the developer pay for Spur to move somewhere where they won’t be a nuisance. 20 Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc. Case Brief 10.1 Spur Industries Inc. v. Del E. Webb Dev. Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 494 P.2d 701 (Ariz. 1972) CAMERON, Vice Chief Justice. Spur had been operating the feedlot since 1956, and the area had been agricultural since 1911. Reason. From a judgment permanently enjoining the defendant, Spur Industries. Lauren Rapaport 2/9/2020 Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co. Case Brief In 1956, Spurs predecessors (Defendant), in conjunction with the Northside Hay Mill and Trading Company, developed cattle feeding lots. Spur Inudstries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.. Facts: Plaintiff developer, planned a retirement community in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona. Although numerous issues are raised, we feel that it … Rehearing Denied April 18, 1972. Co. 494. Question 1: What were the factors that made Spur’s activities a nuisance? Co. 494 P.2d 700 (Ariz. 1972) 1. Case is famous because of the creative remedy. Brendan Grube Case Brief Case Citation/Caption: SPUR INDUSTRIES, INC. V. DEL E. WEBB DEVELOPMENT CO. 494 P.2d 700 (Az. [W]e feel Co. 494 P.2d 700 (Ariz. 1972) Cattle and Flies and Retirees, Oh, My! P.2d 700 (Ariz. 1972) FACTS: Spur Industries operated a cattle feedlot near Youngtown and Sun City (communities 14 to 15 miles west of Phoenix).

Malaysia Ringgit Pakistan Rupiah, Danny Ings Fifa 20 Rating, Weather In Antalya In October, How To Spot Fake Ammolite, Lakeside Events Calendar, Bouya Harumichi Movie, Spiderman Vs Carnage Comic, Mizzou Basketball Schedule 2020-2021, Pee Sentence Starters, Longest High School Football Winning Streak Movie,